Read me for $1

“It’s like a choose your own adventure where you have to pay thirty cents to add a page” -Anthony Carboni

Anthony Carboni from the now defunct YouTube channel Rev3Games summed up microtransactions very well in this episode of their Casual Talk series. Microtransactions allow a person to use real-world currency to purchase in-game content. Whether it be new costumes for their characters in League of Legends, new maps to play in Call of Duty, or gold coins to speed up one’s progress in Clash of Clans. Almost every game, from PC to game console to mobile devices have some sort of microtransactions. The gaming community is torn between whether or not microtransactions are a good thing to include.

Anyone could easily talk about the good, the bad, and the ugly when it comes to microtransactions. The goods are essentially that spending real-world currency allows you to progress in the game a lot faster, or make yourself look cooler. But the truth is, the bad aspects outweigh the good.

In the early days of smartphone gaming, many games were released that were free, yet had additional features to allow you to spend real-world currency. One example of how this turned out bad for people was when a 7-year-old child charged $3,000 to his mother’s iTunes account playing Clash of Clans on her phone. She made the assumption that because a game was “free-to-play,” it meant it was 100% free.

Clash-of-Clans-3-700x350
Gems speed up progress in game, but gems require real money. (Clash of Clans)

League of Legends is the most popular multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game out there today. Despite being a free-to-play game, League of Legends made $1.6 Billion worldwide in 2015. How? Through microtransactions. Players collectively spent $1.6 Billion on costumes for their characters, new characters to play as, and more for a game that was free.

lol-store
Just some of the many characters you can purchase in League of Legends

To add onto the issue, Carboni also jokingly stated in the video how a game company releases a game for $50+ only to release new content three months later and claims the game is finally finished. Before the internet became an essential factor to video games, a game that hit the shelves would be a finished product. Now, games like Call of Duty started a trend involving “season passes,” which are typically $40-$50 one-time payments you make to receive content later on for a game. Season passes generally grant access to exclusive content that a game did not originally include. This poses the question: “Why do developers sell a game that has only half the content in it?” The answer? To make money.

COD_BlackOpsIII_DD_Beauty_Shot
Call of Duty season pass runs $50, which is just shy of the $60 price tag for the “full” game.

Microtransactions are an unnecessary feature in games because if you were already spending a good deal of money on a game, you should expect it to be complete. If a game is free, it should remain that way.

 

Alex is a junior at Concordia University Chicago studying communications and journalism. Follow him on twitter Twitter_logo_blue_48@alexaguiluz_ 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s